| |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
Presentation |
The
presentation was clear, informative, and well planned. It was
creative, aesthetically pleasing to the eye, and interesting. |
The
presentation was informative and organized, but lacked creativity
and pronunciation. There could be more improvement in the
delivery of the material. |
The
presentation was not planned, lacked organization, information and
effort. It was not aesthetically pleasing to the eye nor
flowed well. |
| Pictorial Examples |
The pictorial examples
used were clear, correct, and easy to distinguish. |
The pictorial examples
used were correct, but could be more clear or physically larger. |
There were no
pictorial examples used or the examples were incorrect, out of
focus, or hard to see. |
| History |
The history of the
architecture included time period, origin, and other interesting
facts. |
The history was
incomplete and did not contain the time period, origin, or facts. |
The history of the
architecture could not be determined from the presentation. |
| Length |
The presentation met
the length requirements of at least 5-7 minutes. |
The presentation
failed to meet the length requirements of at least 5-7 minutes.
Short 1-2 minutes. |
The presentation
failed to meet the length requirements of at least 5-7 minutes.
Short 3+ minutes. |
| Creativity |
The presentation was
very creative. It showed effort, cooperation, craftsmanship,
and class. |
The presentation was
somewhat creative, showing some effort, craftsmanship, and class. |
The presentation
showed no creativity or effort. It lacked craftsmanship and
class. |
